The Jays' rotation now includes Dickey, Johnson, and Wang.

It's only getting worse.

figgered out yet why so many on both forums rip you because your posts are about as appealing as a cicada swarm?



Angered and outraged at how every thread seems to divert into nonsense over there. It makes it virtually impossible to maintain an actual conversation.

Shame on that Natsman character! He's just a nasty person. That aside, it's kind of redundant to call someone a pindick dork, don't you think? It's like calling someone a dick-dick or a dork-dork. Semantics, my man. Of course, one has to account for the fact that 'dork' has double meaning - often used to describe someone who is clumsy, inept, goofy, nerdy, etc.....so in that sense I suppose it could be deemed acceptable. Happy to be of service...

Respectfully,
h9
Chairman - BPG Department Of Redundancy Department

"think about what a pindick dork you are." -- Natsman

"pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear". silly me for the omission.

Your buddy sounds like an asshole, Martin and a racist one, too.

Yours is probably filled under moron.

You might have a friend even dumber and more of a bigot than you Martin. Impressive.

Prove that.

The racism in this country is predominantly on the left.

It's already well established that racism is one of the things that drives the left.

Absolutely true.

There is no one more racist than white liberals.

ET, there is no such thing as homophobia. It was made up by gay activists to silence any disagreement with their agenda.

Roberts has no principles and no respect for the Constitution.

First of all, it's NOT a tax, as Roberts himself said on page 15 of his own opinion. And the bill prohibits the mandate from being considered a tax. Uphold the bill, and you uphold that provision.

It's a penalty. It's no more a tax than a ticket or a fine for any other action is.

IF you consider it a tax, it's constitutionally deficient for two reasons:

1. Under the Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House. Obamacare is a Senate bill.

2. The Constitution only empowers the Federal government to lay 4 kinds of taxes: "capitation" taxes (laid on the states in accord with population -- the way the Federal government was funded in the early days of the Republic), tariffs (yes, they are taxes), excises, and income taxes (due to the accursed 16th Amendment, which ought to be repealed.) Obamacare is none of those things.

Upholding the act is a brazen act of judicial activism and judicial tyranny.

Roberts has no principles and no respect for the Constitution.

First of all, it's NOT a tax, as Roberts himself said on page 15 of his own opinion. And the bill prohibits the mandate from being considered a tax. Uphold the bill, and you uphold that provision.

It's a penalty. It's no more a tax than a ticket or a fine for any other action is.

IF you consider it a tax, it's constitutionally deficient for two reasons:

1. Under the Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House. Obamacare is a Senate bill.

2. The Constitution only empowers the Federal government to lay 4 kinds of taxes: "capitation" taxes (laid on the states in accord with population -- the way the Federal government was funded in the early days of the Republic), tariffs (yes, they are taxes), excises, and income taxes (due to the accursed 16th Amendment, which ought to be repealed.) Obamacare is none of those things.

Upholding the act is a brazen act of judicial activism and judicial tyranny.

Roberts has no principles and no respect for the Constitution.

First of all, it's NOT a tax, as Roberts himself said on page 15 of his own opinion. And the bill prohibits the mandate from being considered a tax. Uphold the bill, and you uphold that provision.

It's a penalty. It's no more a tax than a ticket or a fine for any other action is.

IF you consider it a tax, it's constitutionally deficient for two reasons:

1. Under the Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House. Obamacare is a Senate bill.

2. The Constitution only empowers the Federal government to lay 4 kinds of taxes: "capitation" taxes (laid on the states in accord with population -- the way the Federal government was funded in the early days of the Republic), tariffs (yes, they are taxes), excises, and income taxes (due to the accursed 16th Amendment, which ought to be repealed.) Obamacare is none of those things.

Upholding the act is a brazen act of judicial activism and judicial tyranny.

prove it. sure.

there were my posts in that thread that referred to your jailbait jpeg's you posted. those have *not* been deleted.

what has been deleted in that thread? the jpegs you posted that you later obviously SCRAMBLED back to and deleted.

let me guess. those jpegs were the result of "research" you were doing at the time. right, pete townshend?

here's what i can't prove: whether you were born stupid, or instead you perfected it over the course of your life. like an art form, or something.

whether you were born stupid, or instead you perfected it over the course of your life. like an art form, or something.

This is a standard-issue Natsman post. This is the intellectual level, the tolerance level, and the decency level of virtually every post he posts.

guy who gained 10 pounds because he got addicted to edible panties.

"a pindick dork, name's TBP."

Awwww, did someone say something mean to your troll buddy.

Those are powerful voices in your head. Whew.

We're already up to one page, Timmy. Four more to tie your trolling record.

Giddyup..

Sadly typical.

This is a standard-issue Natsman post. This is the intellectual level, the tolerance level, and the decency level of virtually every post he posts.

How is that NOT one step from bestiality?

There are a couple of posters...who never miss an opportunity to insult everyone in sight and divert a thread into nonsense and Hispanic stereotypes.

"pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear"