BallparkGuys

Nationals Board

Posted By: TBP

Nationals Board - 23/01/2013 23:06

There are a couple of posters on the Nationals board who never miss an opportunity to insult everyone in sight and divert a thread into nonsense and Hispanic stereotypes. It makes it virtually impossible to maintain an actual conversation.

One of them admits to having a second ID for the Outside The Lines board. (A couple of posters there who are bringing down the quality of the place, too, BTW.)
Posted By: webmaster

Re: Nationals Board - 24/01/2013 00:49

I don't have time to guess which users are causing problems.

Please point me to the users and/or threads so I can review. PM the info to me, if necessary.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 08/06/2013 05:51

It's only getting worse.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 10/06/2013 20:43

figgered out yet why so many on both forums rip you because your posts are about as appealing as a cicada swarm?

Originally Posted By: TBP
The Jays' rotation now includes Dickey, Johnson, and Wang.


Angered and outraged at how every thread seems to divert into nonsense over there. It makes it virtually impossible to maintain an actual conversation.
Posted By: webmaster

Re: Nationals Board - 10/06/2013 23:28

Originally Posted By: TBP
It's only getting worse.


Again - please send me a link to the offending posts.
Posted By: webmaster

Re: Nationals Board - 10/06/2013 23:29

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
figgered out yet why so many on both forums rip you because your posts are about as appealing as a cicada swarm?

Originally Posted By: TBP
The Jays' rotation now includes Dickey, Johnson, and Wang.


Angered and outraged at how every thread seems to divert into nonsense over there. It makes it virtually impossible to maintain an actual conversation.


Same thing - Send me user names, links so I can review.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 11/06/2013 22:40

"think about what a pindick dork you are." -- Natsman
Posted By: hondo9

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 01:31

Shame on that Natsman character! He's just a nasty person. That aside, it's kind of redundant to call someone a pindick dork, don't you think? It's like calling someone a dick-dick or a dork-dork. Semantics, my man. Of course, one has to account for the fact that 'dork' has double meaning - often used to describe someone who is clumsy, inept, goofy, nerdy, etc.....so in that sense I suppose it could be deemed acceptable. Happy to be of service...

Respectfully,
h9
Chairman - BPG Department Of Redundancy Department
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 14:46

Originally Posted By: hondo9
Shame on that Natsman character! He's just a nasty person. That aside, it's kind of redundant to call someone a pindick dork, don't you think? It's like calling someone a dick-dick or a dork-dork. Semantics, my man. Of course, one has to account for the fact that 'dork' has double meaning - often used to describe someone who is clumsy, inept, goofy, nerdy, etc.....so in that sense I suppose it could be deemed acceptable. Happy to be of service...

Respectfully,
h9
Chairman - BPG Department Of Redundancy Department


pardon me for not being specific: "pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear". silly me for the omission.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 14:46

Originally Posted By: TBP
"think about what a pindick dork you are." -- Natsman


well...yeah.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 20:58

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
"pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear". silly me for the omission.
Prove that.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 21:10

Originally Posted By: DB 5
Your buddy sounds like an asshole, Martin and a racist one, too.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 21:11

Originally Posted By: English Tom
Yours is probably filled under moron.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 12/06/2013 22:34

Originally Posted By: John Lease
You might have a friend even dumber and more of a bigot than you Martin. Impressive.
Posted By: va_nats_fan

Re: Nationals Board - 13/06/2013 13:09

Your list of enemies and detractors is growing impressively long. Did you ever consider that it's you and not everyone else?
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 13/06/2013 15:23

Originally Posted By: TBP
Originally Posted By: Natsman**
"pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear". silly me for the omission.
Prove that.


prove it. sure.

there were my posts in that thread that referred to your jailbait jpeg's you posted. those have *not* been deleted.

what has been deleted in that thread? the jpegs you posted that you later obviously SCRAMBLED back to and deleted.

let me guess. those jpegs were the result of "research" you were doing at the time. right, pete townshend?

here's what i can't prove: whether you were born stupid, or instead you perfected it over the course of your life. like an art form, or something.
Posted By: Deep Fried Screech

Re: Nationals Board - 13/06/2013 17:34

This is a valuable exercise. I am deeply concerned about the consistent prejudice shown by certain posters against entire groups of people, without regard to individual differences. To wit:

Originally Posted By: TBP
The racism in this country is predominantly on the left.


Originally Posted By: TBP
It's already well established that racism is one of the things that drives the left.


Originally Posted By: TBP
Originally Posted By: martin
Liberals consider facts that they don't know to be lies and facts that they don't know about Obama to be racist lies.Common sense is not common to liberals.
Absolutely true.


Originally Posted By: TBP
There is no one more racist than white liberals.


Originally Posted By: TBP
ET, there is no such thing as homophobia. It was made up by gay activists to silence any disagreement with their agenda.



Also, incidences of spamming have been greatly frustrating in the past. The following posts are from three different threads:

Originally Posted By: TBP
Roberts has no principles and no respect for the Constitution.

First of all, it's NOT a tax, as Roberts himself said on page 15 of his own opinion. And the bill prohibits the mandate from being considered a tax. Uphold the bill, and you uphold that provision.

It's a penalty. It's no more a tax than a ticket or a fine for any other action is.

IF you consider it a tax, it's constitutionally deficient for two reasons:

1. Under the Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House. Obamacare is a Senate bill.

2. The Constitution only empowers the Federal government to lay 4 kinds of taxes: "capitation" taxes (laid on the states in accord with population -- the way the Federal government was funded in the early days of the Republic), tariffs (yes, they are taxes), excises, and income taxes (due to the accursed 16th Amendment, which ought to be repealed.) Obamacare is none of those things.

Upholding the act is a brazen act of judicial activism and judicial tyranny.


Originally Posted By: TBP
Roberts has no principles and no respect for the Constitution.

First of all, it's NOT a tax, as Roberts himself said on page 15 of his own opinion. And the bill prohibits the mandate from being considered a tax. Uphold the bill, and you uphold that provision.

It's a penalty. It's no more a tax than a ticket or a fine for any other action is.

IF you consider it a tax, it's constitutionally deficient for two reasons:

1. Under the Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House. Obamacare is a Senate bill.

2. The Constitution only empowers the Federal government to lay 4 kinds of taxes: "capitation" taxes (laid on the states in accord with population -- the way the Federal government was funded in the early days of the Republic), tariffs (yes, they are taxes), excises, and income taxes (due to the accursed 16th Amendment, which ought to be repealed.) Obamacare is none of those things.

Upholding the act is a brazen act of judicial activism and judicial tyranny.


Originally Posted By: TBP
Roberts has no principles and no respect for the Constitution.

First of all, it's NOT a tax, as Roberts himself said on page 15 of his own opinion. And the bill prohibits the mandate from being considered a tax. Uphold the bill, and you uphold that provision.

It's a penalty. It's no more a tax than a ticket or a fine for any other action is.

IF you consider it a tax, it's constitutionally deficient for two reasons:

1. Under the Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House. Obamacare is a Senate bill.

2. The Constitution only empowers the Federal government to lay 4 kinds of taxes: "capitation" taxes (laid on the states in accord with population -- the way the Federal government was funded in the early days of the Republic), tariffs (yes, they are taxes), excises, and income taxes (due to the accursed 16th Amendment, which ought to be repealed.) Obamacare is none of those things.

Upholding the act is a brazen act of judicial activism and judicial tyranny.


I could go on. It's just a shame when people start pointing fingers without looking at their own conduct first. I suggest everyone take a deep breath, remember it's the internet, and stop tattling to teacher when their feelings get hurt.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 13/06/2013 23:17

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
Originally Posted By: TBP
Originally Posted By: Natsman**
"pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear". silly me for the omission.
Prove that.


prove it. sure.

there were my posts in that thread that referred to your jailbait jpeg's you posted. those have *not* been deleted.

what has been deleted in that thread? the jpegs you posted that you later obviously SCRAMBLED back to and deleted.

let me guess. those jpegs were the result of "research" you were doing at the time. right, pete townshend?

here's what i can't prove: whether you were born stupid, or instead you perfected it over the course of your life. like an art form, or something.
Again, prove it.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 13/06/2013 23:19

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
whether you were born stupid, or instead you perfected it over the course of your life. like an art form, or something.
This is a standard-issue Natsman post. This is the intellectual level, the tolerance level, and the decency level of virtually every post he posts.
Posted By: va_nats_fan

Re: Nationals Board - 14/06/2013 02:03

Originally Posted By: Deep Fried Screech


Originally Posted By: TBP
It's already well established that racism is one of the things that drives the left.



Will the baseless accusations and slander never cease?

In this country, we drive on the right.

If you want to drive on the left, tea-sipping royalty-loving gap toothed stiff upper lip pip pip cheerio fop guy, get your ass across the pond in your Mini Cooper with the union jack on the roof.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 14/06/2013 13:52

Originally Posted By: TBP
Originally Posted By: Natsman**
whether you were born stupid, or instead you perfected it over the course of your life. like an art form, or something.
This is a standard-issue Natsman post. This is the intellectual level, the tolerance level, and the decency level of virtually every post he posts.


your screaming cries are fun to read. in the meantime, i'm going to kick back and continue to enjoy how you get mocked & belittled at every forum you post at. wanna know what's even more enjoyable? you get ripped by other posters at the nats board, but you're so feeble-minded you don't even realize it.

i do miss those posts you did a few years ago. when you'd constantly propose inane, lopsided trades in favor of the nats. so allow me: mauer's getting up there in age. maybe the twins wanna unload him. maybe we can get him for eury & suzuki, or are we giving up too much?

have a great day, Brenda.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 28/06/2013 03:10

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
guy who gained 10 pounds because he got addicted to edible panties.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 28/06/2013 03:14

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
"a pindick dork, name's TBP."
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 28/06/2013 04:12

Originally Posted By: English Tom
Awwww, did someone say something mean to your troll buddy.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 28/06/2013 04:16

Originally Posted By: jackson
Those are powerful voices in your head. Whew.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 28/06/2013 04:46

Originally Posted By: jackson
We're already up to one page, Timmy. Four more to tie your trolling record.

Giddyup..
Sadly typical.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 28/06/2013 13:46

Originally Posted By: TBP
Originally Posted By: jackson
We're already up to one page, Timmy. Four more to tie your trolling record.

Giddyup..
Sadly typical.


have a nice day, Brenda.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 15/07/2013 13:06

Habba nyze day, Brainda amigo beech.
Posted By: va_nats_fan

Re: Nationals Board - 28/07/2013 23:59

Sally teebacull.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 27/11/2013 12:55

Wane do peashores an' cashiers rapport?
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 14/12/2013 14:00

Hinda tawn dat I's wuz barn
Leef's a modderfokker who sell da see
An' heem toll us ob heem's life
Een da lann ob soapmaureens
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 20/12/2013 18:35

Originally Posted By: TBP
This is a standard-issue Natsman post. This is the intellectual level, the tolerance level, and the decency level of virtually every post he posts.


you're 100% right. and in the spirit of this plea for understanding, I was distraught by the following seen this week at OTL:

Originally Posted By: BaseBawl
Originally Posted By: Webley Webster
They've making carrying cases with bluetooth keyboards embedded


How is that NOT one step from bestiality?


i'm getting Tiny involved.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 20/12/2013 18:36

Nassynulls bart.
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 04/01/2014 05:52

Heems ray gun heems hab heems sawma da beeguns
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 04/01/2014 14:47

Benny Lane eez een mine ears, an' een mine ice.
Wade bee nitt da blue soap urban skyce
Posted By: Natsman**

Re: Nationals Board - 15/01/2014 17:12

Originally Posted By: TBP
There are a couple of posters...who never miss an opportunity to insult everyone in sight and divert a thread into nonsense and Hispanic stereotypes.


Ease unly gayding worts.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 19/07/2016 03:16

A complete falsehood, Natsman, and you know that. A total lie.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 21/10/2016 21:39

Originally Posted By: Natsman**
"pindick dork who posted pics of underage girls in underwear"


A known and proven lie.
Posted By: SilverFox1

Re: Nationals Board - 09/01/2020 15:12

Sure. Uh huh.
Posted By: TBP

Re: Nationals Board - 19/01/2020 06:05

A known and proven lie that you keep repeating in the hopes that you can make it true by repeating it.
Posted By: SilverFox1

Re: Nationals Board - 27/03/2020 16:44

Sick muv.
© 2020 BallparkGuys